Lockheed Martin has already built 200 of the stealthenabled joint strike fighter and is awaiting federal approval to begin assembly of 94 more in the tenth production lot

Lockheed Promises to Meet F-35 Cost Targets

Jan. 25, 2017
CEO confirms unit cost will get to $85 million by 2019 without slashing profit, margins Pentagon wants 6-7% reduction Trump stirred new concern Q4/Y 2016 earnings, backlog

Lockheed Martin CEO Marillyn Hewson indicated the defense giant would meet the U.S. Department of Defense’s 6-7% target for cost-containment on the critical F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. She confirmed in a conference call prior to Lockheed’s FY2016 earnings release that the cost would fall below the $100-million/jet price widely discussed, and targeted for criticism by President Donald J. Trump, and that the OEM continues to work with its hundreds of F-35 program suppliers to lower overall expenses to $85-million/jet by 2019.

Lockheed is the lead contractor for the F-35, a stealth-enabled, single-engine aircraft developed as a common platform for combat and air defense. The aircraft will be used by the U.S Air Force, U.S. Marine Corp., U.S. Navy, and the U.K. Royal Air Force, as well as defense ministries in several NATO and other Allied nations.

The basic jet design is offered in three variants: the F-35A for conventional takeoff and landing; the F-35B for short takeoff and vertical landing; and the F-35C for carrier-based operations.

Costs have been an ongoing concern for the F-35, nearly from the beginning of the program. Lockheed and other major contractors (BAE Systems, Northrup Grumman) committed to implement cost-cutting strategies and to meet new expense limits as early as 2014, and Lockheed has frequently restated its progress on these fronts.

The program has already built 200 aircraft, and Lockheed is awaiting federal funding for the tenth production lot. (Lockheed and F-135 engine builder Pratt & Whitney received funding to begin the procurement process for materials and systems in July 2016.) Lot 10 would total 94 jets of all variants, for the USAF, USMC, USN, and the Australian, Italian, Norwegian, Turkish, and U.K. air forces.

The cost issue became a new concern during December, when then President-elect Trump said the "tremendous cost and cost overruns" of the F-35 program led him to ask Lockheed rival Boeing to "price-out a comparable F-18 Super Hornet."

"President Trump recognizes that the F-35 is a very large program — the largest program in the Department of Defense," Hewson said in the earnings call with analysts. "He wants to make the sure that the American taxpayer is getting the lowest possible cost on the program."

She also assured analysts and investors that Lockheed’s cost reductions are not being achieved by “slashing our profit” or the company’s margins, but are being gained by bringing down design, material, supply chain, and manufacturing costs.

In its Q4/FY 2016 earnings report, Lockheed announced net sales of $13.8 billion during the fourth quarter and $47.2 billion overall, with net earnings from continuing operations of $959 million in Q4 and $3.8 billion for the full year.

Beyond those figures, Lockheed indicated it was holding an order backlog of $96.2 billion at the end of 2016.

About the Author

Robert Brooks | Content Director

Robert Brooks has been a business-to-business reporter, writer, editor, and columnist for more than 20 years, specializing in the primary metal and basic manufacturing industries. His work has covered a wide range of topics, including process technology, resource development, material selection, product design, workforce development, and industrial market strategies, among others. Currently, he specializes in subjects related to metal component and product design, development, and manufacturing — including castings, forgings, machined parts, and fabrications.

Brooks is a graduate of Kenyon College (B.A. English, Political Science) and Emory University (M.A. English.)

Latest from News